because i am a true nerd, i write a letter to my philosophy teacher tying in fringe to terms we have learned


Fringe is a bundle of ethical problems.  Just one after the other.  The entire series rests on how Walter Bishop suspends the ethical & sacrifices EVERYTHING for his son.  It’s quite similar to Abraham & Isaac, actually.  Walter wants to save his son, & yet he knows that the “right” thing is not interfering with this other universe & plucking him from where he really belongs, & yet this is what he needs to do.  Saving his son, loving his son before all else, is his subjective truth that he lives by.  & yet this starts a domino effect of negative consequences.  Walter Bishop is NOT thinking in terms of utilitarianism.  He places two universes in danger for one boy & nearly dies himself because of it. 

The show deals a lot with utilitarian thinking versus the suspension of the ethical.  Should these individuals put the entire world in danger for their one subjective truth, or factor in the greater good?  More often than not, they choose the subjective truth.  & yet that also brings negative consequences for everyone else.

There’s also the ethical debate of chemically created Ubermensch.  Olivia, the main character, was experimented on as a child with Cortexiphan, removing the limits of her mind.  It’s pretty much the pinnacle of the world having to conform to your ideas; the entire world must conform to Olivia’s will because of her power [you see this all throughout the series.]  These Overmen are created by Walter & Dr. Bell to save the world… & yet it was done without the children’s consent.  & yet having these Cortexichildren with the powers to change their reality as they see fit, to truly recreate the world in new values, is wonderful & could usher in a new world [something that Dr. Bell comes to exploit later.]  But is it “right?”  These children, now adults, were created as a means to an end; they aren’t viewed as humans, but commonly as anomalies & weapons.  They are exploited, but is that exploitation excused because it’s for the survival of the universe/s?  This is explored.

Olivia is also put in a lot of mind / body situations.  Olivia is put multiple times into a state of pure “mind” in a sensory deprivation tank & / or a myriad of drugs, trying to connect with the minds of others hundreds of miles away – sometimes deceased others that do not exist in their bodies anymore.  Even though their body is decaying & dead, the memories still remain & later imprint themselves into Olivia.  It seems that the mind can live without the body… for a little while.  & later in the ultimate example, Peter literally erases himself out of existence, yet traces of him still remain in the minds of his loved ones – but Olivia especially.  & through a combination of the power of love, Olivia’s reality must bend to her will powers, & the immaterial existing [even in the abstract] separate from the material, he is able to come back.  But love is a huge factor.

 Fringe deals a lot about choice [the ultimate choices Walter Bishop makes are just a few].  & it really is about the synthesis of the infinite & the finite.  Different timelines & universes are determined because of finalized choices, choices that can’t always be undone.  Out of infinite possibilities [& possibly infinite parallel universes], our world is this because of these choices.  Your life is this because of these choices. 

& that comes with the question of identity in these parallel universes.  There are people who are the same, yet so very different.  What makes us us?  Our choices?  Our genetics?  Nature?  Nurture?  & what about romances between individuals that are different, yet the same, yet different? 

The thing for Olivia coming back, and learning what happened between Peter and the other Olivia, you’d think she’d have some questions. Who am I? How could you not see who she was or who I am? Does that mean I only exist to you in the external — what I look like? What about my spirit? To have someone fall for someone they only think is you — that’s hauntingly heartbreaking.” ~ Anna Torv in EW, 2010

The Observers question the possibilities of free will.  They are also genetically created Overmen, men with the ability to change the values of the world as they see fit [which we soon find out is commonly removing human threats out of the equation.]  They can see into the future & shape the future by molding people onto “paths” that they have created.  Quite opposite of Lao-tzu thought & finding the “path” for yourself, these Observers can put you on a path that you don’t even know; they are controlling your life & guiding you to objectives that you may not be aware of.  They can also see our choices before we make them; speak our words before we speak them; think our thoughts before we think them [this is terrifying.]  They can peer into the deepest corners of our mind & pull out anything they want.  This is determinism HELL.  Is there free will?  Is there freedom?  & can there be free will & freedom amongst a herd of Observers, created with a purpose?  These masses of genetics are created to be the ideal people, the pinnacle of evolution – the truly authentic individuals… & yet they’re not.  They are a herd in & of themselves.  They obey each other & cold reasoning.  & they do not express their will to power nobly.  They force others to conform to their wills to the cruelest degrees.  You will be disgusted with what they do in the 5th season.

Yet September, the Observer we become the most familiar with, challenges the herd of supposed “authentic” individuals.  By being with humans, he forms his own subjective truths.  He experiences forbidden emotions & the most forbidden – love.  & with love he is willing to sacrifice anything for it.  Even himself.  He is one of the few Observers to become fully authentic.  [Plot twist but this entire letter is a plot twist: they “demote” him to being a human.  But this is ironically fitting.  Humanity fits him.  September does not cry that he is “human, all too human.”  He doesn’t impose limitations on himself, like the Observers thought that he would.  He pushes farther to become more than human.  He becomes better than the Observers.  & his son is better than the Observers still.]

& there are countless other themes, but this is already hella long.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Letter to Markiplier After His Curtis Lepore Collab

re: VIDEO-GAMING / LP SERIES - This did not age well

controversial essay response